A brand new research discovered a number of senior tutorial surgeons had revealed papers in what was once termed “predatory journals.” The newer, gentler time period is “solicited publishing,” nevertheless it defines the identical pay-to-play, low-quality publications.

Surgeons from the College of California, San Diego examined 110 emails despatched to the senior writer from 29 publishers throughout a six-week interval and early 2017. Almost all had been requesting manuscript submissions. The 29 publishers represented 113 totally different surgical procedure journals most of which had existed for 2 years or much less. Solely 12 had been listed in PubMed, and of the 9 that talked about a self-reported influence issue, the median was zero.24 which implies they’d lower than one quotation per article within the final two years. The median publication charge for the 88 journals posting the data was $755.

Emails from the publishers contained a imply of 9.6 grammatical errors, presumably as a result of greater than half had addresses in overseas international locations, and of these with U.S. addresses, 30 % had been residential.

Of emails acquired, 81 % proposed subjects unrelated to the recipients’ follow or subject of curiosity.

The us investigators tried to contact the senior authors of the 117 papers from tutorial establishments and never surprisingly acquired simply 14 responses. Eight of those senior authors claimed they’d not revealed in a journal that solicited publications (both they had been untruthful or maybe worse, had no concept that the journal was one which solicited manuscripts) and 6 admitted they knew they’d revealed in a fringe journal. Two papers concerned work that was funded by the Nationwide Institutes of Well being.

Of their dialogue, the authors puzzled why tutorial surgeons would publish in journals with low or no influence components or not listed in PubMed and identified the research may by no means be cited. I can reply that. The objective is to publish someplace — wherever — not essentially to realize excessive numbers of citations.

That 117 papers from U.S. tutorial facilities had been revealed in bogus journals is embarrassing.

We’re within the midst of a lingering Twitter debate about my final submit calling for the abolishment of obligatory analysis involvement as a part of the coaching of all residents. Some teachers didn’t get it. I didn’t say everybody ought to cease doing analysis. What I mentioned was it shouldn’t be required of each resident.

Tutorial packages can nonetheless contain their residents in analysis, however let’s hope the analysis is worthy of publication in professional journals.

“Skeptical Scalpel” is a surgeon who blogs at his self-titled website, Skeptical Scalpel.  

Picture credit score: Shutterstock.com




Supply hyperlink